Better than the first because it have more action scenes;
Great action scenes all around;
CGI is great almost all the times, less in others (like when the cannons where falling of the ship);
Acting is so-so;
Snyder passion for it is visible;
Even so, being a 3 movies story (if I am right), it seems too little - they worked too much in several characters that don't have time to show potential;
The fuss all around a archaic village is something that I don't find believable;
r96sk
Weaker, but still suitably watchable.
'Rebel Moon - Part Two: The Scargiver' is a more action-packed entry to the franchise, despite that I didn't hold as much interest in this as I did for the previous installment. I did, mind, like seeing the battles commence, both in terms of action and effects.
Sofia Boutella is enjoyable once more, but Ed Skrein isn't as interesting this time around; I would've preferred a new villain for this one, to be honest. Djimon Hounsou does have more to work with on this occasion though, which is only a positive thing. Bae Doo-na has a few nice moments, even if she is underused for the majority.
These movies work for me, what can I say? Kinda mad, however, that they're seemingly planning to make six of...
Ditendra
First part was great and second one is continuing of its success. Another great movie. Good actors, good story, no agenda and BS.
HappyPagan
Enjoyed the first one and was looking forward to seeing where they took it. They took it straight to the bottom. This is unquestionably the worst major studio movie I have ever watched. It's the same story as the first, fighting over a few acres of wheat. The acting is flat, the combat scenes are a joke, the writing isn't even what I would consider a first draft. But if you like watching people harvest wheat in slow motion, this is the film for you.