28 Years Later

  • Horror
  • Thriller
  • Science Fiction
6/18/2025
115
R

In 28 days it began. In 28 weeks it spread. In 28 years it evolved.

Twenty-eight years since the rage virus escaped a biological weapons laboratory, now, still in a ruthlessly enforced quarantine, some have found ways to exist amidst the infected. One such group lives on a small island connected to the mainland by a single, heavily-defended causeway. When one member departs on a mission into the dark heart of the mainland, he discovers secrets, wonders, and horrors that have mutated not only the infected but other survivors as well.

Director:
Revenue:
$126,502,114
Budget:
$60,000,000

Videos

Cast

Reviews

  • rssp55

    Just a wealth of stupid, moronic, and ill-advised ideas.

    The film starts out with a fairly strong intro, but the central character here doesn't have any impact on the rest of the film, so it feels wasted.

    It switches plots halfway through after a strong start, inexplicably.

    I assume the new evolved infected were meant to be scary. I found them to be unintentionally hilarious in several scenes, and if you watch this film you'll understand why.

    The later portions of the film are just as nonsensical, but in short, it gets more and more absurd as it progresses.

    Wait to see it on streaming.

    June 21, 2025
  • TwdPepper

    A beautiful film with a handful of odd choices.

    I was hesitant going into this film. On one hand, it was a mainstream zombie film with a big budget and a competent crew. But on the other hand, it was in a franchise I have never loved, and it was the start of a new trilogy. So, while I was confident that it would be a solid movie, I did not know if it would work for me personally or if it would feel like it could stand on its own. I walked out of the theater satisfied with the film. And in the day since, I have grown even more positive on it and am giving it a 9 out of 10. I think the part that will surprise people the most is the emotional weight that the film carries. And it all comes from the great set of characters and their r...

    June 21, 2025
  • Chin02

    What I will say about this movie is it's not all bad. This first half was really good, with an opening that was reminiscent of 28 Weeks Later. Afterwards though, it cuts to completely different characters for basically the rest of the film. Which would be fine and all, just showing a snippet of how the infection was 28 years before the start of the movie, but it does a weird call back in the ending scene that feels extremely out of place compared to the rest of the film. Aside from that, the first half is really good and the tension of survival of a father and son feels heavy and suspenseful, especially with the addition of a new type of infected: the alpha. This new infected is basically a 'roided up super infected that is both smarter and...

    June 23, 2025
  • msbreviews

    FULL SPOILER-FREE REVIEW @ https://talkingfilms.net/28-years-later-review-ambitious-and-beautiful-but-struggles-with-narrative-overload/

    "28 Years Later is an imperfect but undeniably bold movie - a worthy addition to the saga.

    It's more technically polished, features excellent performances, and even if some of its narrative risks don't pay off, the thematic ambition is admirable, despite struggling to bring all of its elements into a cohesive whole. Danny Boyle and Alex Garland are commenting on the state of the modern world - from national identity crises to the ethics of human survival - delivering moments of high intensity, morally relevant questions, and striking visual filmmaking.

    Though not entirely satisfying, the film leav...

    June 23, 2025
  • Geronimo1967

    Its almost thirty years since Cillian Murphy wandered around in his hospital gown; the so-called rage virus still shows no sign of abating and with Britain effectively quarantined from Europe there are few outposts untouched by its madness. Protected by the tides, the small island of Lindisfarne is one such bastion and thats where Spike (Alfie Williams) lives with his dad (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and his poorly mum (Jodie Comer). Its a big day in the place when Spike is taken to the mainland by his father to make his first kill. Thats not least because he is barely twelve years old and because he has never seen anything of town nor land as far as the eye can see before. Hes also never seen any of the infected before, either. With this trip be...

    June 25, 2025
  • fLeno

    I have waited for 18, painful, years since 28 weeks later was released for this sequel. So, as I am sure it is the case with many Zombie movie fans I had expectations very high.

    The movie is set 28 years after the infection in a, this time completely, quarantined UK and follow a family who lives in a secured village. The dad has a scouting job so the main plot of the movie follows what happens after the 12 years-old son is exposed to the outside of the village and the many new evolved types of zombies and people that now plague the country.

    The movie has good technical quality and the initial sequence with the dad and the child venturing in the open country has the same energy as the first movies, with frenzied zombie pursuits and the...

    June 25, 2025
  • MovieGuys

    "28 Years Later" is a very different film to its predecessors.

    This is humanist tale of what it means to inherit a world that's changed but at its core, remains unchanged. Remember, we all live and we all must die.

    in this sense, the tale of zombies, takes a back seat, as the protagonists have to face the reality of survival but just as importantly, the need to remain human. To live, love and accept loss.

    Whilst the first half of this film feels a little static, the latter half is inexplicably moving, for a film cast in this genre.

    The chemistry between Jodie Comer, Alfie Williams and Ralph Fiennes, is all too familiar and painfully human. Most especially for those of us, who have experienced the loss, of a parent.

    What ...

    July 4, 2025
  • r96sk

    '28 Years Later' delivers a very good flick, I wouldn't rank it too far behind the (albeit superior) original in actuality. I admittedly did think it was going to be more in-your-face unsettling based on a trailer I saw, what with that terrifying (but great!) usage of Rudyard Kipling's "Boots".

    All the same, it is still unnerving in a good amount of patches; it's, for me, definitely the closest that these films have come to being scary. These movies always nail their casting, whilst this is compartively the weakest cast they still impress. Ralph Fiennes steals the show, mind.

    Fiennes is quality, Aaron Taylor-Johnson does bring a strong performance too. Jodie Comer is convincing, while youngster Alfie Williams gives more than what's ne...

    July 4, 2025

Recommendations

Similar Movies